this website’s attitude toward gender non-conforming children and it’s universal insistence that boys who wear skirts aren’t really boys and girls who like short hair and non-feminine colors aren’t really girls is SO primitive and harmful.
how is ~othering~ children who don’t meet your performance standards for their sex NOT reinforcing oppressive patriarchal gender roles and expectations?
the second one? i can buy that somewhat. the first one? breasts are sexual organs.
I SWEAR TO FUCK. NO. NO THEY ARE NOT. BREASTS ARE MEANT TO FEED BABIES. BREASTS ARE NOT MEANT FOR SEXUAL FUCKING PLEASURE. BREASTS SOLE EVOLUTIONARY PURPOSE ARE TO FEED THE YOUNG, NOT TO HUMOUR MEN IN BED.
#the literal sole purpose of a boob is wait for it#AN UDDER#IT IS LITERALLY A COW UDDER#AND PEOPLE TOUCH COW UDDERS TO GET MILK ALL THE TIME#IT AINT SEXUAL OR ELSE IT WOULD BE SEEN AS BEASTIALITY TO GET COW MILK#SO PLEASE#SHUT UP ABOUT IT BEIGN A SEXUAL ORGAN
jesse oh my god
Sexual organs have the capacity to produce gametes (egg, sperm, etc.). Breasts do not have the capacity to produce gametes. Breasts are not linked to sex in any way. They are tools to feed infant humans. That’s it, and it should be obvious through a logical standpoint, but the fact the social acceptability of bare chests varies widely globally should also prove they are not inherently sexual (they are instead sexual*ized*.)
Also, the second image is bullshit because it ignores that women don’t wear clothing designed for men; “women’s pants” are their own thing with the woefully predictable degree of hypersexualization of our bodies (like breasts—starting to see connections?), and we aren’t socially allowed to dress in clothing markedly for men without vicious attacks against us.
getting depressed to the point of suicidal thoughts again, such fun
hellborndaughter said: omg yr icon is my favorite person ever too! ^_^
I LOVE YOU